[.ca] 24 Days: How Two Wall Street Journal Reporters Uncovered ... (ISBN 0060520744)

Great for those who didn't know much about Enron:
As a busy law student, I heard the hub about the Enron and Andersen demise. But I never knew the big players or how things happened. This book gave me a great background on how things unraveled. I felt as though I had read the newspaper reports on Enron from beginning to end. The authors made this book a quick-read. Despite the complexity of the Enron transactions that lead to its downfall, the authors tried to make reading comprension easier for those unfamiliar with corporate dealings and the accounting/financial industry tactics used to further Amercian business. This is a great book that underscored the importance of caution in investing, and also highlights the side of corporate America that are unrevealed to the average investor. Wonderful especially for those who didn't keep up with the scandal when it was initially unfolding.

Interesting book, but fails to really exploit its strength:
This is a pretty decent book. It gives a fairly good overview of what went wrong with Enron and a fairly good look at the process the authors worked through in reporting on Enron for the Wall Street Journal. So, why don't I rate it a 5-star book? Mainly because it doesn't excel in either area. As an Enron story, it's far less revealing than "The Smartest Guys in the Room". As a book about what it's like to be reporters breaking a huge story, I think it fails to convey the sense of excitement and accomplishment they must have felt. So, in my opinion, they produced a good, interesting book that fell far short of its potential. My memory of the events unfolding around Enron's spectacular failure places The Wall Street Journal in a leading role in terms of pressuring the company to start to be more forthcoming in its public dealings. Surely there was a lot of intrigue and tension involved with being the reporters driving this story. But this book doesn't really give the reader a feeling about what that was like. Maybe it was as nearly routine as the feel of the book suggests, but I have to believe it was more gripping than that. And as far as telling the Enron failure story, this book gives a decent overview, but there are better chronicles of that story. So, was I disappointed that I read this book? No, it was pretty good. I just felt it could have been a lot more. I think I'm coming to the conclusion that writers for periodicals don't tend to write the best books. They're good at "just the facts, Ma'am" storytelling, but to deliver a really outstanding book, a writer has to be able to use the larger canvas to paint pictures that he can place the reader in. These authors don't do that and, I'd say that unless you're pretty interested in the Enron story, you could skip this one.

Insightful:
The story was told from two newspaper editors who really stirred up questions for the whole Enron case. It was narrated very well and I found it to be very informative however they could have done without the humor. One thing they were trying to do was add some comical moments in the story however it was very lame and cheesy. That was not the point of the book however it sticks out like a sore thumb. I tend to remember that more than certain parts of the book.

Insightful and Disturbing:
24 Days reads like a John Grisham novel with the (naturally) two journalists as the protaginists sifting through the piles of obfuscation to get to the truth. Ultimately, the book shows that those who raided Enron were nothing more than common crooks, con men and money grubbing amoralists whose only interest was lining their own pockets. Sadly, justice has yet to be (if it ever will) served against many who were involved and the connections between Enron and current Administration remain woefully underreported. What I can say is that the two journalists have done a great job of showing how the house of cards fell down. My only criticism, and it's a minor one, is that to the layperson, many of the financial terms will be hard to understand and the complex transactions that hid the billions in debt Enron had can be difficult to follow. Otherwise, this is highly recommended reading for people who want to know what crony capitalism is all about.

Great summary from the newswire's angle...:
This book gives a very clear description of "who knew what, when," or "who told what, when." The authors convey the excitement of trying to develop contacts within Enron and Arthur Andersen, and how they had to protect their sources. They describe in detail how they broke the story, and how, in 24 days, Enron and Anderson both imploded. I remember reading the original Wall Street Journal articles and being amazed at how the reporters covered the company, even after the media feeding frenzy began three weeks into the implosion. I agree with other reviewers who say the accounting schemes needed to be explained better. Basically, one needs to know the relationship between a company's balance sheet and cash flow statement. With that, the reader can understand how Enron tried to off-load its liabilities (from the balance sheet) and used Special Purpose Entities (such as LJM, LJM2, and the Raptors, which Enron funded) to inflate their income. The Special Purpose Entities themselves "paid" for the Enron assets with stock that Enron supplied to the Special Purpose Entities (without charging Balance sheet "Equity.") Get it? The house of cards was OK until Enron stock began falling. The story ends in 2003, and there have been a lot of developments since then. Nevertheless, this is an exciting story.