[.ca] Franklin Delano Roosevelt: The American Presidents (ISBN 0805069593)

The Good Brief Book on Roosevelt:
This is a very good brief introduction to Roosevelt, and I highly recommend it to anyone wanting a brief understanding of Roosevelt. Being written by a man from Britain, it also shows how the world views him - as one of the most important leaders in world history. You will not acquire a thorough understanding of FDR by reading this book. For that I would suggest "Champion of Freedom" by Conrad Black or the two-volume biography by James MacGregor Burns "The Lion and the Fox" and "Soldier of Freedom." In response to Mister Syzek, my understanding is that Stalin broke his promises and controlled Poland despite the agreements made. Stalin was determined to control Poland no matter what, so Poland was never really on the table. Franklin Roosevelt was a geopolitical realist, and the reality is that the Soviet armies controlled Eastern Europe and Poland. Stalin de facto controlled Poland. The American people had no enthusiasm for yet another world war againt Russia. They wanted their soldiers home. Maybe you should ask the American people why they were not willing to suffer 5 million killed for Poland. You see, in America you must deal with these pesky things called voters and democracy. So Roosevelt extracted what he could from Stalin: firm promises of elections and a free Poland. Roosevelt got everything he wanted from Yalta and was very sneaky to be able to get Stalin to promise even that. To complicate the matter, the Soviet Union took the brunt of the war (17 million dead), and Stalin was rigidly determined to secure a buffer between Mother Russia and Western Europe. Stalin would not have budged on his goal. So what Roosevelt obtained from Stalin was the best he could obtain - firm promises from Stalin to hold elections. It was Stalin who broke his promises. That made the Soviet Union look like the bad guy. Truman then waged the Cold War (without the millions of dead from a hot war) leading to an eventual liberation of Eastern Europe. It's no surprise that Reagan was a huge fan of Roosevelt, voted for him four times, and attended his third inauguration (a moving event for Reagan). Reagan then brought an end to the Cold War without firing a shot. You may be able to criticize Truman for not liberating Eastern Europe while American had a monopoly on the atomic bomb... or Eisenhower. Then again, maybe the path Truman took was wise. Maybe Roosevelt would have done things differently. We will never know because he died. What we do know is that he extracted promises from Stalin, which he later broke. I just want to stress that Stalin was determined to have Poland, no matter what. Please look at Stalin's goals and determination. The Russian armies took Poland on the way to Germany, and there was nothing Roosevelt could do about that. Here FDR was a realist. At the same time, Roosevelt was an idealist in the Wilsonian tradition when realistic. He believed in the free determination of free people, but he was also realistic. For example, he essentially pushed for an end to world colonialism in his design for the post-war world. Churchill opposed this but he could do nothing about it. The British empire was too weak. By the way, Poland was not even a country at the start of World War One and was viewed by some in a similar way to the Baltic States of Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia. Should American have gone to war over the Baltic States? This fine little book is a fine introduction to Roosevelt. It is the best brief book on Roosevelt. If you want a more detailed study of Roosevelt's foreign policy then read Robert Dallek's Bancroft Prize-winning "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy." My opinion pales in comparison.

Nice Compact Biography:
* Roy Jenkins' FRANKLIN DELANO ROOSEVELT (FDR) provides a short biography of Franklin Roosevelt, the 32nd president of the United States. Jenkins traces through FDR's upbringing as the only child of the domineering Sara Roosevelt; his ambiguous relationship with his wife Eleanor, who was actually a niece several times removed; and his rise in politics. Jenkins paints FDR as the perfect politician, charismatic and charming, something of an opportunist and a fence-straddler. Roosevelt was never a very healthy man, possibly an effect of a sheltered upbringing, and he was crippled by polio in 1921. However, he had a certain energy that made him seem much more vital than he really was, the public impression of him summed up in popular cartoons of him with a raised jaw, a self-assured smile, and a cigarette in a holder clenched in his teeth. That energy got him the governorship of New York State twice, confounding those who thought he was a lightweight or could be manipulated, and then four terms as President of the United States. There is little doubt that he was one of the great American presidents, but true to his nature as a perfect politician there was often less than met the eye in his actions. He was certainly devious, but he was so good at it that it sometimes seemed like an outright virtue. He generally wanted to do the right things, but sometimes his methods for getting from here to there didn't bear too much close inspection. He was also certainly hated, particularly by the upper crust, who regarded him as a traitor to his class. His efforts to help the common people gave him the popularity to defy this hatred. He was also quick to denounce the rise of authoritarian regimes abroad, but until war actually came denouncing was almost all he did. He promised to keep the US out of war, but in 1940 began Lend-Lease, the name itself being a cover for what amounted to a pure military assistance program to Britain, and then ordered the US Navy to escort cargo vessels to mid-Atlantic to protect them from Hitler's U-boats, characterizing this exercise with characteristic clever doubletalk as "neutrality patrols". There are those who believe that FDR actually knew about Pearl Harbor ahead of time and let it happen to ensure that America would get into the fighting, but Jenkins makes the case (not too hard to do) that this is nonsense. Pearl Harbor was still convenient in that respect, and it was even more convenient when Hitler, angry over Lend-Lease and the "neutrality patrols", declared war on the US a few days later. In any case, FDR spent the war giving his people free reign to conduct a mighty war effort and presiding over an uneasy Allied alliance. Jenkins argues that only FDR had the stature to take such a leadership position. When FDR died in April 1945, the nation mourned, though he still remains to an extent a controversial figure. Certainly his considerable expansion of government involvement in American society has proven over the long run a mixed blessing. In fact, the argument over the proper role of government in society is one of the most important issues in American politics today. Jenkin's FDR is a very tidy little biography, only about 175 pages long, and mostly focused on FDR's political life. Those after dirt about his marriage and his affairs will not get much out of this book. The fact that Jenkins was a Britisher (he died of a heart attack just before completing this book) and a member of parliament gives a bit of an interesting flavor to the work, for example with Jenkins describing politicals dealing from the point of view of someone who was clearly familiar with such things personally. I will often say, if not exactly complain, that most biographies and historical works give me more information than I need, but in the case of Jenkin's FDR I would have liked to have seen maybe about 25 to 50 more pages of anecdotal material, FDR's life having plenty of good stories to mine for such things. However, that said, I have to recommend this little book as a fine introduction to the fascinating, inspiring, complicated, and somewhat shifty FDR.

FDR:
Two points: Where was FDR when Poland, then Britain were on their knees and being devastated? The second point, Poland and her fate were minimized in what was an altogether too short a book to deal with such a significant figure, and the impact that he had upon our world. The United States and Britain betrayed Poland to Russian Communist control. The victim of Nazi Germany became again the victim of Soviet Communist domination, through the appeasement of Stalin by Churchill & FDR at Yalta and the "sphere of influence" power politics of the time. The U.S. and Britain sacrificed an expendable Poland to gain time and space for their own retaliation against Germany. They failed to recognize Russia's sinister motives in overplaying the "Lend-Lease" card, without consideration of the consequences. FDR was a great domestic President, with little knowledge of, or appreciation for, foreign policy in other countries like Poland, whose contribution to Nazi defeat was enormous. Try reading the point of view of Poland, in "A Question of Honor". I would rate that book "six stars"!

An excellent final book for a quality biographer.:
The author, in this his final book, is British with an illustrious career as a biographer of such figures as Gladstone, Churchill, and Truman. He also served in his country's ministry. At first glance, it may seem controversial to assign to a foreigner the task of writing about one of America's greatest presidents. However, Lord Jenkins gives a perspective of Roosevelt without the tint of American politics. It is amazing and disturbing to me the amount of enmity that some in this country express towards Roosevelt, bordering on delusional. What Roosevelt did for this country cannot be adequately expressed in a short biography, or in any book. Much of his pre-war accomplishments translated into an emotion of hope and optimism that moved to a sense of security during the war years. The author addresses and logically dismisses the paranoid charges that either Roosevelt and/or Churchill allowed Pearl Harbor to occur. As one who lived in Britain during the war, he demonstrates Roosevelt's importance to freeing the world of fascism, and unsettling Churchill's colonialist interests. Fanatical right wingers condemn Roosevelt for the Yalta agreement's failure to rid Poland of the Soviets. The author (actually the co-author who wrote the last few pages after the main author's death) notes that neither Roosevelt or Churchill are at fault since Stalin was already in full control of Poland with no intention of peacefully moving. My only criticism is the abruptness in which Eleanor Roosevelt is left out of the story. Of course, Mrs. Roosevelt is deserving of her own book that is not the point of this presidential series. It is a shame that more people will not read this book. I recently wrote a review of the NY Times plagiarist Jayson Blair's book and that received a few dozen responses. This is perhaps my fourth or fifth review of an American President series book and the total responses number only a handful. I reason that much more can be gotten out of reading quality biographies of worthy individuals than concerning ourselves with an immature nobody.

An Elegant Little Life:
Roy Jenkins, the prolific biographer of British Prime Ministers Gladstone and Churchill (as well as American President Harry Truman), died early last year, before this slim biography of Franklin Delano Roosevelt was completed. But even in its flawed state (it was completed by Richard E. Neustadt), this is an impressive book by an author of great knowledge and erudition that illuminates in intriguingly quirky ways the epochal life of its subject. Jenkins was an Englishman active in Labour politics for half a century, and his is a very British take on Roosevelt's life, which both works and doesn't work to Jenkins' advantage. It is always problematic when an author is not of the same nationality as the person he's writing about (William Manchester's still-to-be-completed biography of Churchill, for example, was much criticized by the British). Where Jenkins gains in giving us a new perspective on a oft-told tale, he sometimes loses in dragging in references to the subjects of his previous books (an occupational hazard of the prolific biographer) or comparing some American political situation to its British equivalent when the comparison is tenuous at best. Some of his more British asides are lost on the average American reader (as when he opines that the style and appearance of Groton, the prep school that Roosevelt attended, supposedly an imitation of Eton, "were much more like Cheltenham's or Marlborough's"). Also, because the author died before he had the chance to read proof, the text is not as precise as it might have been had the author lived longer (there is at least one sentence that defeats my attempt to make sense of it grammatically - it starts on the 19th line of page 73 and begins with the words "In consequence..."). These reservations aside, I am impressed with Jenkins' ability to take a long and complicated life and condense it into the brief span of this American Presidents series, while still making it comprehensible. The shelves of libraries groan under the weight of the F.D.R. biographies out there, but if you're looking for a concise life that tells the story of the 32nd President from a unique point of view, you might want to try this book before tackling one of the heftier volumes.